Skip to footer

Prince Phantom 93P 18x20 Racquet Review

Overall 85
Groundstrokes 84
Volleys 85
Serves 83
Returns 81
Power 73
Control 90
Maneuverability 78
Stability 86
Comfort 87
Touch/Feel 90
Topspin 78
Slice 87

Summary

You can count the number of midsize racquets on the market today on one hand. Prince makes two of them, and one is this updated Phantom 93P 18x20. The specs have not changed much in this technology update, which places Twaron and Textreme at 10 and 2 o'clock in the upper hoop and shaft for a more solid and responsive feel higher in the stringbed. Along with the classic player's frame head size, this racquet has a 12.2-ounce strung weight, thin box beam, low 60 RA and 18x20 string pattern. Everything about this racquet points to control and precision, which our playtesters found in spades from the baseline. At net, that control was enhanced by a classic, silky and plush feel. All in all, this updated Phantom 93P 18x20 will be a seamless transition from the previous model, and advanced-level players who crave a heaping helping of classic control mixed with a dash of modern performance should give this midsize racquet a try.

Upsides

  • Excellent feel
  • Control
  • Stability

Downsides

  • Harder to flick angles cross court

Bottom Line

You'll get all the touch, feel, control and stability you can handle from this midsize racquet.

Ability

Advanced

Groundstrokes - Score: 84

Our playtesters took advantage of the Phantom 93P 18x20's control and precision when hitting groundstrokes. Always one to play with variety, Chris found this racquet to work well for his game. He explained, "What an amazing racquet to hit a backhand slice with! I loved the way it cut through the ball. The small head made it feel fast and aerodynamic for its weight, the response was buttery smooth and the grip from the stringbed was perfect. I was able to drive my slice with lots of aggression or place it to the corners to move my opponent. When hitting the ball with topspin I had to aim much higher compared to the 14x18 version because the launch angle was much lower. Once dialed in, I found tons of control coupled with predictable power and spin. Early preparation was rewarded with big powerful drives where I could use the mass of the racquet to hit heavy shots. On the flip side, this Phantom 93P 18x20 didn't offer the flickability of the racquets I tend to gravitate toward, which made it harder when defending and when looking to roll a quick angle."

Troy felt extremely confident from the baseline when hitting out on the ball. He said, "As with the previous iteration of this Phantom Pro 93P 18x20, I found surgical precision. From one perspective, this racquet doesn't offer much help in generating power, but that meant I could unload on my groundstrokes without fear of the ball flying long. My ability to command the ball around the court was enhanced with this racquet. I loved the touch and feel it provided when hitting slice and drop shots. The dense string pattern offered a lot of control and a very point-and-shoot trajectory on flatter strokes. There were times when I found it a bit difficult to generate sharp topspin angles to pull my opponent off the court. The launch angle felt somewhat low compared to the 14x18 version of this Phantom 93P. Other than struggling a bit to generate arc and topspin on my angled groundstrokes, there was a lot to love about this racquet from the baseline."

Mark experienced a seamless transition from one of his previous racquets of choice to this update. He said, "I have switched racquets a few times since I used the first generation of the Prince Phantom 93P, and I have to say that I was pretty excited to playtest the newest iteration. From the first forehand feed, I could tell that this is very much the same racquet as the prior model, and by the end of the first practice session I also detected some slight changes. The most noticeable difference was that the tip of the hoop felt firmer and more stable when making ball contact around that part of the stringbed. Easy precision was the phrase that kept coming up for me while playing with it from the baseline. Its directional control was outstanding for my game, as was its comfort level, which is tied to both its high static weight and thinner beam profile. When the racquet was paired with an edgy polyester, I never had an issue developing an effective level of topspin from its 18x20 pattern. I could aim closer to the lines instead of just one side of the court or the other. In terms of slice, this Prince Phantom features a 93-square-inch head size and an 18x20 pattern. Need I say more?"

Looking to grip and rip, Michelle liked the low-powered response off the stringbed, but found over time that it didn't necessarily suit her game. She said, "This playtest began right where the previous version left off. It was a seamless transition, and in all honesty, it did not feel dramatically different. This is probably a racquet I should spend more time hitting with because it really allowed me to tune into my fundamentals. Because the racquet has a very low-powered response, I am left to generate my own power and cannot overhit as long as I am striking the ball correctly. The feel at contact was consistently comfortable, and while the head size is only 93 square inches, it felt like it had a generous sweetspot and was more forgiving than expected. The issue I had with this racquet was the amount of work it took to overpower opponents point after point. I like a thicker, stiffer beam to help a bit here and there with power. I found myself giving up some ground in rallies with this racquet, especially when exchanging several big, deep shots, whereas with my Wilson Pro Staff RF97 I can maintain depth, up the power ball by ball and eventually force an error or overpower my opponent. This update seemed a bit more stable than the previous version, and I felt better connected to the ball."

 view 2

Volleys - Score: 85

With its amazing feel, touch and precision, the Phantom 93P 18x20 came to life for our team while hitting volleys. Michelle loved this racquet at net. She said, "The Phantom 93P shines at net. It felt stable and silky smooth. Touch, precision and feel were all there. I was able to block back anything big drilled at me and had access to some touch. I could also effectively hit aggressive shots and swinging volleys. I had no complaints at the net. The Phantoms can do no wrong for me up there."

As an all-court player, Chris found this racquet to suit his game as he transitioned to net. He explained, "I loved volleying with this racquet. The response was smooth and comfortable. I also felt very connected to the ball. My touch shots were working really well because the soft frame response and the dense stringbed worked together to provide exceptional feel. The racquet also offered great stability, which further enhanced my sense of comfort and control. I was able to put the stability to good use both when looking to punch volleys away and when fending off a hard-hit shot."

Troy was also a fan of the Phantom 93P 18x20 at net. He said, "As soon as I struck the first volley with this racquet, I felt like I was holding a scalpel, as fellow playtester Granville would say. I could carve up precise angles and drop a volley short in the court with little effort. On contact, this racquet felt solid and smooth, and I felt very connected to the ball. Considering it is around 12 ounces strung, the Phantom 93P felt very maneuverable, and I didn't find it sluggish when having to react quickly in doubles. The ball didn't jump off the stringbed, like with a Pure Aero Tour type racquet, but I could generate easy depth on my volleys thanks to the overall mass."

Mark added to the chorus of praise, saying, "Well, Troy did send a few ATP-quality forehand passing shots at me, for which I had no reply, and reminded me that I had a 12.2-ounce racquet in my hands. Other than that, I really like what the new Phantom 93P's overall weight, balance and precision-oriented head size did for my game at net. Even when I was not perfectly set up for a volley, if I got the Phantom 93P underneath the ball the result was most often an effective volley."

 view 3

Serves - Score: 83

The control and precision of the Phantom 93P 18x20 stood out yet again when our playtesters were serving. Mark found this racquet to be right in his wheelhouse in this category. He said, "This was my favorite shot to hit with the new Phantom 93P, and unlike what I mentioned during the review of the prior model, there were no kinks to work out this time around. I did not have quite the same level of directional control on serve as I did with my groundstrokes, but it was effective enough to get me wondering why I ever switched away from this frame."

Michelle didn't find this racquet to be a complete package when serving. She described, "Because of the lower powered feel, I sometimes felt I had to muscle the serve and force any power I could find out of the racquet. Precision and targeting were easier to focus on instead. The racquet didn't cut through the air as fast or as effectively as the Phantom 97P, but it did target the corners of the service box well."

Chris appreciated how aggressive he could be when starting points. He said, "I liked the way the Phantom 93P 18x20 went through contact on serves. The racquet offered ample plow through, and the small head made it feel quick and maneuverable. I loved adding some slice to my serves with this racquet because the stringbed offered ample grip, and I found it easy to find pace. I couldn't get quite the hop on second serves like I could with the 14x18 version, but I was still finding enough spin to serve aggressively."

Like the others, Troy tapped into the precision and control this frame provided. He said, "It was all about hitting the corners of the service box with this Phantom 93P 18x20. Prior to this playtest, I hadn't played with a midsize frame in quite a while. I forgot how precise and smooth serves felt with a racquet like this Phantom 93P 18x20. On my flat serves down the middle I was very consistent, and I was hitting them close to the lines. I wasn't generating a whole lot of extra pace on my serves, but they were still effective. Kick serves were landing in the corners of the service box frequently, and I was able to muster up some sharp angles. I wasn't getting quite as much speed and height on my kick serves as I do with a stiffer, midplus racquet like the Babolat Pure Aero Plus, but my percentages were much higher. I really enjoyed my being able to find my targets with this racquet on serve."

 view 4

Returns - Score: 81

The stability of the Phantom 93P 18x20 allowed our playtesters to return serves effectively. Chris used the racquet's specs to his advantage when returning. He explained, "I continued to find a solid response from the Phantom 93P 18x20 when it came to returns. I was able to relax and let the racquet do the work. When blocking returns, I found enough mass to push the ball back with depth, which helped me neutralize a big serve. When I had the opportunity to take a crack at the ball, the Phantom 93P 18x20 provided tons of control to let me swing away with confidence."

For Troy, this racquet held up even against the hardest servers. He said, "I loved the solid and comfortable sensation when striking my returns. When I was facing big servers this racquet held its ground and felt plush on contact. Because of the head size, I found it to be more effective to hit my returns hard and flat. I could block the ball back easily when I needed to. The slice and chip returns were also working very well for me. I could keep the ball low and deep, and it made it very difficult for my opponents to serve and volley. My favorite part was when I had the time to take a big swing on my forehand returns; I would whack the ball hard and flat without it flying long on me."

The Phantom 93P 18x20 meshed well with Michelle's aggressive returns. She said, "This racquet was fun to return with. It absorbed pace well and felt very stable against even the bigger servers. The sweetspot continued to feel larger than I would expect from a 93-square-inch head size. The flexible feel was nice at contact, and I could stab returns back easier than with the previous version. I also loved ramping up my swing and attacking weak serves. With the tighter stringbed, I felt dialed in when going after my targets. This racquet shone on returns, in my opinion."

Mark loved this racquet's precision on returns. He explained, "With the exception of dealing with an extremely fast pitch that had some movement on it, most everything about the new Phantom 93P complemented my return of serve. When playing a friend who consistently launches serves that are well over 100 mph, I was consistently seeing his serve returned to empty court space, which was unnerving to him and confidence-inspiring to me."

Overall - Score: 85

Likes

Michelle - "I love the Phantom 93P 18x20's precision and low powered response. It's fun to swing big with!"

Mark - "Weight-wise, it is at the upper limits of what I can effectively swing over a longer period of time, but the Phantom 93P's wind-cheating head size and thin beam help make all that weight much easier to manage. Aesthetically, in the parlance of our times, I might refer to its paint scheme (which I like) as 'purple haze,' but I think Prince is calling it grey-purple."

Troy - "Superb control, feel and precision. On the volleys it offers that scalpel-like feel, where I feel like I can drop the ball on a dime!"

Chris - "I love the plush feel, control, comfort, stability and the drive I can find on my backhand slice."

Dislikes

Michelle - "I'm not always the biggest fan of a racquet with a lower RA, but it suits this Phantom 93P 18x20 perfectly. No real complaints from me."

Mark - "Admittedly, I struggle with both versions of the Phantom 93P 18x20 when paired with a round/smooth string. The launch angle becomes pretty low, meaning my loopy forehands are going to land a bit short in my opponent's court. For me, the profiled polyester is the magic string option for this frame."

Troy - "Topspin potential isn't this racquet's strong suit, and I find it a bit difficult at times to hit short, cross-court dippers."

Chris - "I find it harder to flick angles on groundstrokes and have to be more disciplined with my stroke mechanics."

Comparing the racquet to others they've tried, our testers said:

Mark - "The closest comparisons are going to be with the prior Phantom 93P 18x20 and the 14x18 version. From there, we can include the Head Prestige MP and Dunlop Srixon CX 200 Tour 18x20. Based on its head size and weight, the Head Prestige Mid is also physically similar to the 93P. Lastly, the Phantom 93P 18x20 is the easiest tight-patterned, mid-sized, over-12-ounce racquet I have tested or won tournaments with."

Michelle - "Compared to the previous version, this new Phantom 93P 18x20 feels a bit more stable, and I feel more connected to the ball. I have also tried a few other Phantoms on this go around and honestly, compared to the 97-square-inch Phantom, this Phantom 93P 18x20 feels like it has a similar headsize and sweetspot. I love the stability and plow through of the 93P. It's my favorite of all the Phantoms for sure!"

Troy - "This update to the Phantom 93P 18x20 feels similar to the previous iteration, but it’s slightly more firm in the hoop and maybe a bit more stable. This is likely the most precise and control-oriented racquet on the market. The closest racquet is probably the Dunlop Srixon CX 200 Tour 18x20, but this Phantom 93P is a bit more stable in stock form. The Volkl Power Bridge 10 Mid is the closest in terms of control and feel, but the Power Bridge 10 Mid is more spin-friendly and a bit softer."

Chris - "A solid update to the previous Phantom 93P 18x20, I found a more responsive and forgiving stringbed from this version without any loss in the feel, control and comfort I loved in the first version. From other brands, not much comes close to the silky-smooth response found here. I'd likely add on the re-released Wilson Six.One 95s, a Dunlop Srixon 200 Tour and a Tecnifibre TFight 315 XTC Ltd (knowing I'd have to add some weight to it) to my demo order with this Phantom 93P 18x20."

Technical Specifications
Length27 in69 cm
Head Size93 sq in600 sq cm
Weight12.2 oz346 gm
Balance Point12.4 in 31 cm8.8pts Head Light
Construction20.5mm / 19.5mm / 16.5mm
CompositionTextreme/Twaron/Graphite
String Pattern18 Mains / 20 Crosses
Babolat RDC Ratings
ScoreGrade
Flex Rating60Range: 0-100
Swing Weight329Range: 200-400
 
Chris' Scores
Power8.5Serves8.4
Control9.1Groundstrokes8.6
Maneuverability8Returns8.5
Stability8.4Slice8.6
Comfort9.1Topspin8.5
Touch/Feel9Volleys8.8
Overall8.7
Troy's Scores
Power6.6Serves8.3
Control9.5Groundstrokes8
Maneuverability8.2Returns7.8
Stability8.9Slice9.3
Comfort8.8Topspin7
Touch/Feel9.3Volleys9
Overall8.4
Michelle's Scores
Power7Serves8.5
Control9Groundstrokes9
Maneuverability7.5Returns9
Stability8Slice8.5
Comfort9Topspin7.5
Touch/Feel9Volleys8.3
Overall8.9
Mark's Scores
Power7Serves8
Control8.5Groundstrokes8
Maneuverability7.5Returns7
Stability9Slice8.5
Comfort8Topspin8
Touch/Feel8.5Volleys8
Overall8

Playtester Profiles

Chris: 4.5 all-court player currently using the Tecnifibre TF40 305. Chris uses a full-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.

Michelle: Open level baseline player with a semi-western forehand and a two handed backhand. She currently plays with the Wilson Pro Staff RF 97 Autograph.

Troy: 5.0 lefty all-court player with a full Western Forehand and a two-handed backhand. Troy currently plays with a Yonex VCORE Pro 97 330.

Mark: 5.0 lefty all-court player with a one-handed backhand. He currently plays with the Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Pro.

Play Tester Profiles